In addition, this study is to examine whether the sitting balance and trunk control can predict mobility. Therefore, the aim of this study is to confirm the sitting balance and trunk control measured using the evaluation tools, such as SBS, TIS, TCT and PASS-TC, and mobility have meaningful relationship of sub-acute stroke survivors. However, if SBS is a tool for evaluating the balance of patients who have remarkably limited gait or have difficulty maintaining the standing balance, it is necessary to verify whether it has discrimination as a sitting balance evaluation tool that can predict whether a person can actually walk. Īs the results of these previous studies, sitting balance, trunk control and mobility are correlated with each other. And the PASS-TC is correlated with Barthel Index and balance subscale of Fugl-Meyer Assessment. The TIS and TCT have a relationship with the following tests for mobility: the gait subscale of Tinneti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment, Functional Ambulation Category, 10-meter Walk Test in stroke survivors. The evaluation tools measure bed mobility, trunk control and sitting balance. There are other tools for assessing sitting balance, such as the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), Trunk Control Test (TCT), Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke-Trunk Control (PASS-TC). The SBS appears to be a valid, objective and comprehensive measure of a patient’s sitting balance ability. The SBS showed meaningful intra- and inter-rater reliability, it is valuable for sitting balance examination in older adults who are non-ambulatory or have limited functional mobility. Ĭonsidering this limitation, Medley et al developed a form of Sitting Balance Scale (SBS) that can examine the patients who have decreased balance and gait abilities. In particular, it can be difficult to test the balance of stroke survivors using Likert ranking scales that examine sitting balance. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is used to investigate the sitting and standing balance, however, BBS may show a floor effect when examining stroke survivors who have decreased balance. Since, previous studies investigated the prediction for mobility by evaluating post-stroke balance dysfunction. In addition, it is needed that prediction of the mobility level can induce active participation in rehabilitation through noticeable motivation. One of the physical goal of stroke rehabilitation is to restore the level of mobility, it is imperative to inform patients and their family of possible levels of mobility recovery to lead a normal social life. However, the mobility is needed for independent daily living, goal setting of rehabilitation through mobility prediction is necessary for all stroke patients. ![]() Since, prediction of mobility after stroke is possible to only a few of these patients. Most patients with acute and subacute stroke have a poor sitting balance, they cannot maintain the standing posture. Hence, the balance evaluation of stroke patients is one of the essential factors that can assess the functional level of the stroke patients.īalance can be measured in a sitting and standing position. Decreased balance ability is a common symptom due to stroke, it can affects gait and activities of daily living. Hemiparesis of stroke survivors can reduce the function of trunk and extremities, resulting in impaired sitting and standing balance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |